Protecting Title IX

Fifty years ago, women’s volleyball wasn’t even a varsity sport at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Fast forward a half century and Nebraska volleyball is must-see entertainment. Matches at the Devaney Center are standing room only. The Huskers again led the nation in home attendance last year with crowds averaging over 8,200 per match. And their national championship match against Wisconsin in December broke collegiate volleyball records for both in-person attendance (18,755) and TV viewership (nearly 1.2 million).

The huge popularity and success of Husker volleyball wouldn’t have been possible without Title IX. Part of the Education Amendments of 1972, Title IX prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex, paving the way for women to have opportunities on par with men—in athletics and many other arenas. Motivated by Title IX, UNL made volleyball a varsity sport in 1975. Title IX has made a lifechanging impact in countless women’s lives over the past 50 years.

Now, the future of Title IX is in jeopardy. The Biden Administration is working to overhaul its meaning. His first day in office, President Biden signed an executive order, supposedly to combat “sex discrimination.” However, that’s not what the order does. Instead, it radically reinterprets Title IX and redefines sex to include sexual orientation and gender identity.

We're seeing the Biden administration move forward with its changes to Title IX in various federal agencies, including at the Department of Agriculture. In May, the USDA announced they would adopt these changes to Title IX. Any school that chooses not to comply risks losing federal food aid – including the school lunch program. This is food security blackmail that puts children in the crosshairs. But the administration didn’t stop there. Not long after, on the 50th anniversary of Title IX, the Department of Education reiterated its intent to apply the Biden executive order’s changes throughout our schools and colleges.

DOEd’s change poses a direct threat to the intent of Title IX in several ways.

The new definitions of discrimination go beyond the basic biological definition of sex and pose a risk to the integrity of women’s sports. Gender is now claimed to be “an internal sex identity.” But there is not a single medical test to determine a person’s internal sex identity, because that struggle exists in the mind, not in the body. What we do know is that sex is biologically determined at conception.

We certainly need to support all students. Teen years are a difficult time for children, especially those who are experiencing gender dysphoria or gender incongruence. We need to recognize increased risks these children face. However, we can be supportive and still recognize the biological differences between boys and girls, men and women.

The Biden administration’s change to Title IX discriminates against women—in direct contradiction to the original intent of the landmark law. This policy will ultimately require allowing boys who identify as female to compete against biological females in sports and for athletic scholarships.

These changes also introduce other far-reaching implications. For example, the changes to Title IX would require administrators, students, educators, and staff to stifle their free speech and deeply held convictions about sex and gender or risk punishment for sex discrimination. It would force schools to choose between vital federal funding and going along with a divisive political agenda.

As a parent, I am also concerned with the implications this change would have on parents’ rights.

The administration’s changes will also weaken local control of education by empowering federal agencies to punish teachers and schools who believe in the original intent of Title IX. These discussions should be handled at the state and local level.

Once again, I’m calling for concerned Nebraskans to take action. We need to guard against the Biden Administration’s attempt to twist the meaning of Title IX. They are collecting input on the DOEd’s rule change through Sept. 12. I am preparing to comment and I urge Nebraskans to weigh in as well. Go to http://www.regulations.gov/document/ED-2021-OCR-0166-0001 to comment.